Politics disguised as Justice

How the Israeli justice system has become a strong, unsupervised, political body, that is not held responsible for the consequences of its decisions and why this situation endangers the future and existence of the State of Israel.

06-05-2020

By Prof. Elisha Haas, former chair of Professors for a strong Israel

A Jewish state is, by definition, an unusual body among states. Its existence is contrary to natural geopolitical conduct; therefore, its existence arouses forces acting both internally and externally to do away with its uniqueness or its very existence. Therefore, there will always be within her and in the environment, tension between the natural aspiration for normalization and the unnatural aspiration for uniqueness, according to Jewish tradition. This is the source of the abiding existential danger that lurks for the Jewish state.

This tension erupted with great intensity in the year 1977, due to the general passing of the generation on one hand, and on the other, the reverberation from the Yom Kippur War, which crushed the Zionist  Left’s vision and gave rise to the post-Zionist Left. In 1981, a right-wing government came to power again. The Left concluded that 1977 was not an accident, but reflected a profound change in the public and that it would be difficult to return to power democratically. Therefore, there was no choice but to act in ways to circumvent democracy.

The New Israel Fund was created, whose main  goal is to eliminate the Jewish state (to turn it into a “state of all its citizens”) and it focused on methodical, long-range penetration of the justice system. The plan to eliminate the Jewish state was aided by the right-wing politicians’ lack of awareness and when Prof. Aharon Barak was admitted to the High Court, he considered himself the Left’s emissary in the circumvention.

In the first generation of the state it was acceptable for the High Court, which is a court of appeals, could also sit as the High Court of Justice, whose sole function is to give support to the private citizen who was suffering from the government’s arbitrary behavior. This is the “right of standing”, which is limited to the private citizen. Aharon Barak, acting very wisely and patiently, step by step, turned the High Court of Justice into a tool of power and political actor, not subject to public scrutiny and bearing no responsibility for the results of its decisions. In the first phase, he abolished the restrictions on the “right of status” and invited any organization or citizen to request involvement in the decisions of any body in the state. Gradually, Barack and his judicial clones repealed laws, determined de facto what was legal and what was not legal, repeatedly ignoring explicit laws (that is, they openly broke the law in the name of “the rule of law”), emptied laws of their content, invented “reasonability” tests in order to interfere in every public and private matter, illegally. They lorded the ideology of “the enlightened man” over the public.

They were aided by three factors: 1. The unique method of judicial appointment, where judges control the appointment of judges, which made possible the “cloning” process. 2. The awe and negligence on the part of politicians who were afraid of harming the court, exploited its undeserved immunity to the nth degree, which it retained thanks to the merit of the first generation, and 3. Barak enacted most of these precedents by harming only the haredi public, so that the general public did not feel harmed and paid no attention to the seriousness of the precedents.

The result: in the 72nd year of its existence, the Jewish state has lost the title “democratic”, because a group of appointed judges who could not pass the public scrutiny broke the boundaries of the separation of powers and imposed their political ideology to the public without taking any responsibility at all. The court dragged us into elections by overturning the Tal Law, and the heavy cloud that was created over the judicial executive branches paralyzes the systems without even touching them.

By the very fact that they meet to discuss the appeals that undermine the ability of the person elected by the public to serve as prime minister or as minister, the judges do away with the essence of democracy, in which the people are the sovereign and they are their servants, not their masters (regardless of the decision, which is affected, in any case, by political considerations). The moment that they did not immediately reject the appeals that were served before the 72nd Independence Day, the judges revealed the dangerous situation into which they have drawn the Jewish democratic state.

This is a most dangerous situation because actually, the power of the public to decide fateful matters for the existence of the Jewish state is nullified. Their involvement in the existential debate between the Zionist Right and the post-Zionist Left, which is a great step in the path of circumventing democracy, endangers the ability of the Jewish public to protect the existence of the Zionist project, which is under constant danger by opposing forces.

A Jewish state is not a natural entity, so it is in danger of being destroyed by opposing forces, from within and without. Therefore, there is no choice but to rectify the crazy situation that we have come to as a result of the long process that began in 1983. The public must demand that its political representatives totally rectify the situation: 1. Change the method of appointing judges, by passing the selection to elected representatives only. 2. Renew the separation of powers by legislation restricting the court. 3. Enact a law to limit the right of standing. 4. Meanwhile, to not obey political decisions of the court.

The court “has no wallet and no sword”. Its entire power is built on the public’s trust and compliance with its decisions. The public’s trust has eroded. In such a situation, if the court does not return to the boundaries from the era before the regime change led by Aharon Barak, the politicians must act immediately with disobedience followed by legislation. Since the entire power of the court is in speech alone, it also knows how to recognize when it is facing a resolute power and it will know how to retreat, so that it will be possible to have an effect even without actual disobedience. Aharon Barak himself, when he understood that he went too far in allowing the import of pork, suggested to the Knesset to enact a law to nullify his own decision.

The Zionist public must declare to its elected representatives that only someone who commits himself to enact laws restricting the High Court will get their support. We must call on our present representatives to stop obeying the court and stop honoring black-caped politicians, thus restraining them.

Comments
facebook comments
This site is run by volunteers, all donations accepted
Support for the idea of sovereignty
More Articles
All Articles >
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
Policy Paper Ahead of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Visit to the White House and the Expected Pressure Campaign
03-07-2025
Just before the Prime Minister departs for his visit to Washington, the Sovereignty Movement is releasing a position paper outlining the principles and values that must be upheld—even in the face of significant friendly pressure.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​And now, as the Middle East is being renewed…
Yehudit Katsover and Nadia Matar
24-06-2025
A new front has been added to the military one — the political diplomatic front — and on this front, we can no longer rely on miracles, even after having witnessed so many. The renewed Middle East now emerging must include Israeli sovereignty over Judea and Samaria and the rejection of the idea of a Palestinian state.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Blessings and Commitment: We Will Bring Sovereignty
20-06-2025
Ministers and public figures sent their greetings to the Youth for Sovereignty Conference held in Sderot. Watch the videos.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
The Victory Paradox
20-06-2025
Israel must translate its military victory into a historic political achievement that changes reality. Sovereignty is such an achievement.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Watch the Sovereignty Youth Movement Alumni Panel
17-06-2025
Alumni of the Sovereignty for Youth Movement and its former leaders gathered for a special panel on the meaning of being sovereignty ambassadors and ways for youth to influence major processes.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Minister Eliyahu: Want Sovereignty? Roar It Out Loud
17-06-2025
Minister Eliyahu at the Sovereignty Youth Conference: Building on the Youth for Sovereignty as the hope and strength of the State of Israel.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Sovereignty Legislation Closer Than It Appears
15-06-2025
The current coalition has led the way to the regularization of young communities and to an overwhelming vote against a Palestinian state. MK Rothman is convinced that sovereignty legislation is approaching.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Decisions are made in Jerusalem and not in Washington
15-06-2025
CEO of Yesha Council, Omer Rahamim: "Sovereignty can be applied in next week's government meeting. You just need to want it."
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​We Can No Longer Conduct Ourselves as We Did Before the Day of the Massacre
15-06-2025
In a moving and powerful speech, Shimon Elkabetz, who lost his daughter in the October 7th massacre, addressed the Sovereignty Youth and called not to forget what monsters we are facing.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Sovereignty: This Is How It Will Happen
15-06-2025
Knesset members Halevi and Illouz, leaders of the Sovereignty Lobby in the Knesset, in a joint interview on the stage of the Youth for Sovereignty Conference in Sderot.