Wake up! Wake up! A Palestinian state is on the way!

Amos Ben-gershom

We are more than ever concerned these days, in light of the political process, the deceptive reports and announcements in the media. We hereby issue cautions and warnings.

Yehudit Katsover and Nadia Matar
10-09-2020

We see a number of red blinking warning lights that the “peace” with the Emirates and other Arab countries is not really “peace in exchange for peace”, as it is presented by the Prime Minister and his people, but is an integral part of the Deal of the Century, part of the process of formulating a Palestinian state.
 
Now is the time to turn our attention to the bright, blinking red warning signals showing us the tragic direction that the current political steps are leading to.

 1. In the preface to the Deal of the Century, the following quote appears: “We believe that if more Muslim and Arab countries normalize relations with Israel, it will help advance a just and fair resolution to the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians”. It seems that the agreement with the Emirates and other Gulf states is leading us directly in this dangerous direction. 

2. The pressure on Abu Mazen to return to the negotiating table and accept the Deal of the Century is increasing from outside as well as from inside. From Egypt, the Emirates, the United States, and even within the Palestinian leadership. Below we mention a few indications of these pressures: The Arab League refused to hold the urgent conference at the request of the Palestinian Authority.

  • Bahrain rejected the PA’s request to approve a clause to condemn normalization.
  • Saudi Arabia allowed an Israeli flight over its skies (but announced that it would not normalize its relations with Israel until a Palestinian state is established).
  • Sources in the Palestinian Authority and Fatah say, in closed discussion, that the policy of “sit and do nothing” is costing the Palestinians a heavy price.
  • Sources in the PA estimate that “the threat of annexation” has been postponed for two to five years at least and that Abu Mazen must take advantage of this to return to the negotiating process.
  • A Palestinian security source said that lately, there have been contacts between the American and Palestinian security forces to investigate the PA’s readiness to return to negotiations in light of the postponement of the annexation plan.
  • The Palestinians have made it clear to the Americans that meanwhile, there is covert security cooperation between them and Israel. (All of this information is from Middle East expert Baruch Yadid, head of the Arab desk at the TPS news agency)
  • Last but not least, and apparently the most concerning: We must remember that the main player in the deal with the Emirates is former senior figure in the PA, Mohammed Dahlan, the close confidant of the Emirates’ leader Prince Mahmoud Ziad. Dahlan is looking forward to the day when he will return to leading the PA and will succeed Abu Mazen. He is interested in doing this as head of the Palestinian state. This is where he is directing the Emirates’ leadership.
 
The fact that Defense Minister Benny Gantz is willing to hold a meeting of the planning and building committee in order to make 5000 housing units available in Judea and Samaria does nothing to reduce the concern over the establishment of a Palestinian state. There is no better way than a few building crumbs to silence and paralyze the residents of Judea and Samaria and the Right.
 
Another worrying item: The Prime Minister is still committed and bound to the paradigm of two states. He never denied it or expressed regret for the Bar Ilan speech. Even if he claims that it would be a “demilitarized” state, everyone knows that ultimately a demilitarized state is a state like all other states.
 
Does Israel gain anything from this political process? Is this really a win-win situation? Will Israel really have “peace in exchange for peace”? After all, the purpose of the Deal of the Century is the solution to the “Palestinian problem”, meaning, the establishment of a state for them. The American president sees this goal as an impressive achievement and proof to his people that he has the power to do what all the presidents before him could not do. President Trump seeks to prove his abilities as a deal-maker in the political sphere too. In the speech that he gave on the 28th of January, 2020, at the White House, President Trump made it clear that “Forging peace between Israelis and Palestinians may be the most difficult challenge of all.  All prior administrations, from President Lyndon Johnson, have tried and bitterly failed.  But I was not elected to do small things or shy away from big problems.”
 
 It seems that the “peace” process now being formulated for economic and commercial development has one result: the surrender of large parts of the Land of Israel and the establishment of a Palestinian state. Pinhas Inbari, a veteran journalist and commentator on Arab affairs, senior consultant and researcher for the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, who writes books on the Palestinians, writes clearly on this topic: In his essay from Sep. 9, 2020 in “Zman Yisrael”: “After we have sobered up from the fake-annexation, the time has come to sober up from the fake “peace for peace”. “There is a problem with the Americans. They mean what they say. To understand the Trump plan, you just have to listen to the program manager Jared Kushner. They intend that a Palestinian state will arise in parts of the West Bank. The Palestinian state will bring Arab states into an agreement with Israel – the original Saudi plan but in reserve order. Not a state first and normalization later, but first normalization and then a Palestinian state”.
 
We must really ask the entire Rightwing camp: Aren’t we, with our paralysis, advancing the establishment of a Palestinian state? Are we, on the Right, at all aware of the tectonic change that is happening here? And what should our response be?
 
We are raising the alarm about the existential danger concealed in the political processes that are leading to the establishment of a Palestinian state in the heart of our Land. A majority of the people and a majority of the Likud ministers and right-wing members of Knesset oppose a Palestinian state and many have worked hard for sovereignty.
 
The agreements with the various countries must be done from strength and faith, without harming the Land of Israel! We have returned to our Land to dwell in it securely and for our concern for future generations.
 
A huge process might develop in our area if we act with the knowledge of our own spiritual, physical strength and our historic destiny. It is still possible! True leadership can bring about wonderful results in the world. When historic justice is done, the ethical side is strengthened and will act throughout the entire world.
 
It is now just before the Days of Awe, days of individual and collective rectification. “Today the world was conceived, today all the creatures of the world are judged”.

Comments
facebook comments
This site is run by volunteers, all donations accepted
Support for the idea of sovereignty
More Articles
All Articles >
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
The Latest "Settler Violence " campaign-What really Happened in Qusra
14-08-2026
The “settler violence” campaign has found its latest cause célèbre in the Arab village of Qusra, south of Shechem — and this time, even U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee appears to have been taken in by the narrative.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
The “Settler Violence” Campaign Is Part Two of the Gaza Famine Lie
14-08-2026
The latest spin in the campaign against the Jewish communities demonstrates that this is a battle over the truth, against progressive branding that presents the world with a film that begins only in the middle. Before you is an article by Shlomo Filber on Channel 14’s website.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
August. Everyone Is on Vacation. Hamas isn't
Yehudit Katsover and Nadia Matar
14-08-2026
Precisely now, when it seems that everything has slowed down a little, things are happening in Gaza that we cannot afford to ignore
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
A Blazing Red Warning Sign: The Roadmap to a Terror State
07-08-2026
Sovereignty Movement and Forum HaGevurah members called on Cabinet ministers: Stop the plan that puts Israel back on the path toward the disastrous creation of a Palestinian state.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
Sovereignty Movement to Cabinet Ahead: "Stop the Roadmap and the 20-Point Document!"
05-08-2026
In a letter sent to the Prime Minister and members of the Security Cabinet following the entry of the Peace Council into the Gaza Strip, the Sovereignty Movement calls for an immediate halt to the advancement of the "Roadmap" plan. "This framework returns Israel to the security reality that existed before October 7."
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
Do Not Let the Magic Word “Unity” Silence You
22-07-2026
Former Director-General of the Yesha Council, Omer Rahamim, warns against the weakening of the right-wing camp and its values through the exploitation of concepts such as "mamlachtiut", unity, and love of Israel.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
Tisha B'Av – The Romans Are Not the Ones on Trial
Yehudit Katsover and Nadia Matar
22-07-2026
If Tisha B'Av were taking place in a courtroom today, who would we place in the dock?
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
A Tour of Faith, Sovereignty, and Action
17-07-2026
A new generation has arisen—a generation that did not grow up with Oslo and totally reject Oslo. It is a healthy generation, deeply connected to the Land of Israel, knowing that the entire Land belongs to the Jewish people.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
Call at the Knesset for a Commission of Inquiry into the Oslo Accords. interview
14-07-2026
Following the Sovereignty Movement's call for the establishment of a State Commission of Inquiry into the Oslo Accords, Nadia Matar was interviewed by Arutz Sheva (Israel National News), where she explained in depth the significance of this demand. We invite you to read the interview below:
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
The Farms Are Under Threat - Now Is the Time for Sovereignty
Yehudit Katsover and Nadia Matar
13-07-2026
Sovereignty is not merely a political objective - it is the insurance policy for the settlement enterprise.