Working Together for Israel Victory

Photography: miri zahi

This moment is right for fresh thinking in order to dispatch the old and stale Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

Daniel Pipes
president of the Middle East Forum
18-05-2018

With Arabs focused on other issues – the Iranian nuclear weapon build-up, civil wars in Libya, Yemen, Syria, and Iraq, Turkey going rogue, the Islamist surge, and the water drought – hoary anti-Zionist taboos have lost much of their pungency. A prosperous and strong Israel has lost hope in decades’ worth of “peace process.”

The cowboy in the White House likes breaking with precedent. And עוגןthe global Left’s turn toward antisemitism, עוגןexemplified by Jeremy Corbyn of the British Labour Party, adds further reason for urgency; when it eventually holds power, the implications for Israel will be dire.

Conventional wisdom holds that the Arab-Israeli conflict will end only when the Palestinians’ grievances are sufficiently satisfied so that they accept the Jewish state of Israel. This paradigm has reigned almost unchallenged since the Oslo Accords of September 1993; yet, that 25-year period has also made clear that Palestinians in overwhelming numbers (I estimate 80 percent based on scholarship and polling data going back a century) seek not peaceful co-existence with Israel but the brutal elimination the “Zionist entity.” With such attitudes, it comes as no surprise that every round of much-hyped negotiations has eventually failed.

I shall propose an entirely different approach to resolve the conflict, a reversion to the strategy of deterrence and victory associated with Zionism’s great strategist, Vladimir Jabotinsky (1880-1940): Israel should aim not to please its enemies but to defeat them. Counterintuitively, I shall show why Palestinians need precisely such an Israel Victory to slough off their current oppression, extremism, and violence, and to become a successful people.
------------------------------

An understanding of today’s situation requires going back to the aftermath of World War I and the emergence of Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the first modern Palestinian leader. He initiated a policy of rejectionism, of absolute refusal to accept any aspect of Jewish presence in what was then the British Mandate of Palestine. A century later, that rejectionism remains the dominant strain of Palestinian life. Political differences tend to be tactical: Better to eliminate Israel by negotiating with the Israelis and winning benefits from them, or stick to the consistency of pure rejectionism? The Palestinian Authority (PA) deploys the first tactic, Hamas the second.

Over a 75-year period, 1918-93, the Jewish community in what is now Israel responded to rejectionism with deterrence, the policy of dissuading its enemies from aggression by threatening painful retaliation. However imperfectly applied, deterrence helped Israel evolve from the prospective prey of 1948 into the military powerhouse of 1993. Yes, even as Israel became a democratic, innovative, affluent, and mighty country, the basics stayed in place. Ideologies, tactics, strategies, and personnel changed, wars and treaties came and went, but Palestinian rejectionism stayed stagnantly constant.

By 1993, frustrated with the slow-moving and passive nature of deterrence, Israel’s impatient citizenry opted for an immediate resolution with the Palestinians. In the Oslo Accords, each of the two parties promised the other what it most wanted: recognition and security for Israelis, dignity and autonomy for Palestinians.

In their haste to end the conflict, however, Israelis made three profound mistakes that summer morning on the White House lawn: (1) Granting Yasir Arafat, leader of a unofficial, dictatorial, and murderous organization, diplomatic parity with Yitzhak Rabin, prime minister of a democratic and sovereign state. (2) Believing עוגןArafat when he claimed to recognize Israel, when in fact he (and his successors) still sought Israel’s elimination, now enhanced by his controlling two adjoining pieces of territory, the West Bank and Gaza. (3) Making concessions under the illusion that wars conclude through goodwill, when concessions actually had the contrary effect of signaling weakness and thereby amplified Palestinian hostility. These mistakes, tragically, turned a would-be “peace process” into a counterproductive “war process.”
------------------------------
How to escape this 25-year dead end?

The study of history shows that wars typically conclude not through negotiations but through defeat and victory. According to the military historian Victor Hanson, “Conflicts throughout history become serial when an enemy is not utterly defeated and is not forced to submit to the political conditions of the victor.” עוגןDefeat means giving up war ambitions. Victory means imposing one’s will on the enemy.
 
It’s a simple, universal truth that Palestinians well understand. In July 2017, Fatah declared that the “campaign for Jerusalem has effectively begun and will not stop until a Palestinian victory and the release of the holy sites from Israeli occupation.”

To gain Palestinian acceptance, Israel must return to its old policy of deterrence, of punishing Palestinians severely when they aggress. One example: When rockets come out of Gaza, water, food, and electricity do not go in from Israel for increasingly longer periods of time.

That’s deterrence; it’s more than tough tactics, which Israeli governments already pursue; it means developing consistent policies to break rejectionism and encourage Palestinian acceptance of Israel. It implies a strategy to crush irredentist Palestinian ambitions so as finally to end the demonizing of Jews and Israel, recognize historic Jewish ties to Jerusalem, “normalize” relations with Israelis, close the suicide factories, and shutter the entire machinery of warfare. This process will be neither easy nor quick: it requires Palestinians to suffer the bitter crucible of defeat, with its attendant deprivation, destruction, and despair. Unfortunately, there is no shortcut.

A change of heart implies, not just a permanent absence of violence against Israelis but shutting down completely, everywhere from the United Nations to the university campus, the Palestinian-driven campaign of delegitimizing Israel.

If Palestinian defeat is good for Israel, it is ironically even better for Palestinians, who will finally be liberated from ugly ambitions, revolutionary rhetoric, and genocidal fantasies. An educated and skilled people can then improve its life by building its polity, economy, society, and culture. Think of this as a miniature version of post-1945 Germany. עוגןAnd if diplomacy is now premature, issues such as Jerusalem, borders, and resources can be fruitfully discussed after a Palestinian defeat. 

How those issues should be resolved, however, goes beyond our mandate; Israel Victory is solution agnostic. Our goal is only to get Israel to the point where the Palestinians are no longer an enemy. We avoid what happens next for three reasons: It’s premature to be working this out now, it distracts attention from victory, and it obstructs making Israel Victory appealing to as wide as possible a swathe of Israelis, Americans, and others.
------------------------------
Western powers should support an Israel acting within legal, moral, and practical boundaries to take the steps necessary to win. They should move their Israel embassies to Jerusalem, reject the Palestinians’ claim of Jerusalem as their capital, stand by the Israel Defense Forces when it punishes savagery, and join U.S. ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley in denouncing the “Palestine refugee” farce whereby some children born today are deemed refugees.

Starting about a year ago, the organization I head, the Middle East Forum, has promoted the idea of Israel Victory, in part by organizing Israel Victory caucuses in both the Israeli parliament (26 members from 7 political parties) and the U.S. House of Representatives (a bipartisan group of 33 members) and in part by working closely with Im Tirtzu to promote this concept among Israelis.

Even opponents of this idea recognize its impact. Writing about Amb. Haley, Palestinian commentator Daoud Kuttab wrote that she “seems to repeat verbatim the Israeli and pro-Israeli lines of people like Daniel Pipes.” The Guardian newspaper, among others, suggested that Donald Trump moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem under the influence of the Israel Victory Project.

So, let’s work together for victory.

Comments
facebook comments
This site is run by volunteers, all donations accepted
Support for the idea of sovereignty
More Articles
All Articles >
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
MK Osher Shkalim: Sovereignty is not a privilege, it is our duty
10-07-2025
Likud MK Osher Shkalim Makes an Impassioned Plea from the Knesset Podium for the Application of Sovereignty
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
Youth to Likud Ministers and Knesset Speaker: Thank You for Your Determined Call for Sovereignty
08-07-2025
Representatives of the Sovereignty Youth Movement presented Likud ministers and the Speaker of the Knesset with certificates of appreciation for their letter urging the Prime Minister to immediately apply sovereignty over Judea and Samaria.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
Policy Paper Ahead of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Visit to the White House and the Expected Pressure Campaign
03-07-2025
Just before the Prime Minister departs for his visit to Washington, the Sovereignty Movement is releasing a position paper outlining the principles and values that must be upheld—even in the face of significant friendly pressure.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​And now, as the Middle East is being renewed…
Yehudit Katsover and Nadia Matar
24-06-2025
A new front has been added to the military one — the political diplomatic front — and on this front, we can no longer rely on miracles, even after having witnessed so many. The renewed Middle East now emerging must include Israeli sovereignty over Judea and Samaria and the rejection of the idea of a Palestinian state.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Blessings and Commitment: We Will Bring Sovereignty
20-06-2025
Ministers and public figures sent their greetings to the Youth for Sovereignty Conference held in Sderot. Watch the videos.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
The Victory Paradox
20-06-2025
Israel must translate its military victory into a historic political achievement that changes reality. Sovereignty is such an achievement.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Minister Eliyahu: Want Sovereignty? Roar It Out Loud
17-06-2025
Minister Eliyahu at the Sovereignty Youth Conference: Building on the Youth for Sovereignty as the hope and strength of the State of Israel.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Watch the Sovereignty Youth Movement Alumni Panel
17-06-2025
Alumni of the Sovereignty for Youth Movement and its former leaders gathered for a special panel on the meaning of being sovereignty ambassadors and ways for youth to influence major processes.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Sovereignty Legislation Closer Than It Appears
15-06-2025
The current coalition has led the way to the regularization of young communities and to an overwhelming vote against a Palestinian state. MK Rothman is convinced that sovereignty legislation is approaching.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
​Decisions are made in Jerusalem and not in Washington
15-06-2025
CEO of Yesha Council, Omer Rahamim: "Sovereignty can be applied in next week's government meeting. You just need to want it."