Don’t be satisfied with just Maaleh Adumim

Photography: gershon elinson

Women in Green Press release: Don’t be satisfied with just Maaleh Adumim. Do not settle for partial sovereignty

04-01-2017

The Women in Green movement wishes success to the campaign of beginning sovereignty in Maale Adumim, but warns against a partial vision of sovereignty.
 
The Women in Green movement, that promotes the vision of sovereignty, congratulates the Land of Israel Lobby and along with it government Ministers and Members of Knesset promoting the implementation of Israeli law and sovereignty in Maale Adumim, but along with this warns against being satisfied with a partial vision of sovereignty.
 
The movement stresses that the implementation of sovereignty in Maale Adumim becomes significant only if it represents a first step in a campaign towards the completion of the Zionist, historical and moral vision needed and called for – the implementation of the sovereignty of the State of Israel over all of Judea and Samaria.
 
“Let us not be satisfied with a partial vision of the implementation of a focused and regional sovereignty, which is likely to make us lose sight of the living and breathing connection between the people of Israel and all of the areas of its land, a connection of which sovereignty is an essential and required part”, say Yehudit Katsover and Nadia Matar, the movement’s heads, reminding us of Rabbi Tzvi Yehuda Kook’s famous call: “Where is our Hevron? Have we forgotten it?! Where is our Schechem [Nablus]? Are we forgetting it?! Where is our Yericho [Jericho]? Are we forgetting it?!”.
 
“During these days of the beginning of our standing upright and the strengthening of the call for sovereignty, which is gaining increasing support among Israeli’s citizens, we say clearly and remind everyone – we haven’t forgotten, not Hevron, not Schechem and not Yericho. All of these are the cradle of the birth of the Jewish people, and a foundation of the right of the Jewish people to its land. Our path leads to sovereignty over all parts of our land”, say the two who see the planning of sovereignty over Area C alone as nothing but “a surrender to the dictates of the Oslo Accords and the maps of the agreement that reaped a bloody harvest over many years, that must be stopped with a long range and complete plan for sovereignty over all parts of our land”.
 
“Consensus is not the determining factor of our borders, but rather the historical right of the Jewish people to its land, a right that is an obligation to inherit the land and to settle on it; we do not have a right to give away any part of it at all”, say Katsover and Matar.

Comments
facebook comments
This site is run by volunteers, all donations accepted
Support for the idea of sovereignty
More Articles
All Articles >
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
The People of Israel Are No Longer Reluctant to Invoke the A Word
Yehudit Katsover and Nadia Matar
19-11-2024
There is one word that many Zionist shlichim around the world are forbidden to say out loud, and this is exactly the time to say it again with full force and power.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
If I were King of Jordan
Yehudit Katsover and Nadia Matar
19-11-2024
The call for Israeli sovereignty over the Jordan Valley is being adopted by many experts and communities in Israel. What does the King of Jordan really think about it?
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
Smotrich: 2025 will be the year of sovereignty over Judea and Samaria
14-11-2024
Mknister Smotrich, in his speech congratulating Donald Trump: The only way to remove this danger from the agenda is to apply Israeli sovereignty over the communities in Judea and Samaria. I have no doubt that President Trump, who demonstrated courage and resolve in making decisions in his first term, will support the State of Israel in this process.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
The Truth is self-evident
05-11-2024
The return to Zionist and Jewish values are becoming increasingly apparent. This reawakening of so great a segment of the general public, alongside Ambassador Friedman's revolutionary book, are central components of the birth of a new era
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
What has happened to the US Democratic Party?
21-10-2024
The Biden administration's adversarial stance toward Israel, reminiscent of Obama's, which contrasts sharply with its more accommodating and favorable approach to Iran, is deeply rooted in a perception gaining increasing traction in the U.S. Democratic Party.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
One Year to the Massacre – Reason, Meaning, Consequences
14-10-2024
On October 7th, we were invited to participate in a Zoom organized by Mort Klein, chairman of the ZOA. Below is a link to the zoom and a transcription of our remarks. Other participants included MK Dan Illouz, attorney Alan Dershowitz, and Dr. Sebastian Gorka.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
Indeed, the Time Has Come for a New Order
Yehudit Katsover and Nadia Matar
01-10-2024
We have (almost) concluded in the south, are escalating the campaign in the north, and not forgetting the threat from the east. After the collapse of its outposts in the north and the south, Iran is expected to focus its efforts on the Jordanian border.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
At Last We Are Saying to the World: No to a Palestinian State
24-09-2024
MK Ze’ev Elkin initiated, Knesset members from the coalition and the opposition joined, and the unequivocal statement of the Knesset was opposition to the establishment of a Palestinian state. The only dissenters were the Arab MKs. The parliamentary road is a long one.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
The Sovereignty Movement Prepares for a New Year of Activity
19-09-2024
A special tour, lectures, and discussions in preparation for the activity year of 5785. The steering forum of the Sovereignty Movement is preparing to promote the vision of sovereignty in Judea and Samaria both on the ground and in the Knesset.
ריבונות - כתב עת מדיני
Sovereignty, Without any Fear at all
19-09-2024
The head of Jordan Valley Council believes, with all his heart, in the vision of sovereignty, but when sovereignty was proposed in the Jordan Valley in the framework of the Trump plan, he vehemently opposed it. Why? And why is it difficult for him to imagine the leadership taking the first vital step, sovereignty in the Jordan Valley?